Details of Nepal resignation

By Bhola B Rana

Kathmandu, 30 June: The prime minister went to meet Prime Minister Dr Ram Baran Yadav after the address.
Nepal said he couldn’t let the state of indecision continue and it was getting late to present the annual budget in parliament.
Efforts for an attempted solution with Maoists were inconclusive, he said.
He said his experience with main opposition Maoists was ‘bitter’.
Nepal succeeded the nine-month government led Maoist Chairman Prachanda who quit without facing parliament to test the successor government had a majority in the legislature.
Prachanda quit following his failure to implement several decisions which he couldn’t implement under domestic or international pressure.
He failed to follow through replace an Indian bhatta at Pashupatinath temple, the holiest Hindu shrine in Nepal.
The Maoist-led government replaced the bhatta and a Nepali Brahmin.
The issue at Pashupatinath is not the traditional bhatta to conduct daily pujas and rituals but transparency in the management of offerings at the temple.
Prachanda had to resign when he couldn’t implement his own government to sack Army Chief Gen Rukmangud Katawal who was retained by President Dr Ram Baran Yadav.
Analysts said the Prachanda government attempted to disrupt the entire command structure of the state army which retaining his command of the PLA.
A direct confrontation between the government and the army was real—the army won when the executive prime minister resigned and Katawal continued. More
nnnn