30 passengers feared missing

Kathmandu, 6 Sept.: About 30 passengers are feared missing when a passenger bus plunged into Bhote Kosi river in Sindhupalckowk Monday morning.
Three swam to safety.
The bus was traveling to Baharabishe from Tatopani
nnnn



Split in Madesh front

Kathmandu, 6 Sept.; The four-party Madesh front split Sunday ahead of the failed attempt to elect a prime minister in the sixth round election.
MJF-Nepal led by Upendra Yadav didn’t participate in the vote as three other parties of the front—MJFL, TMLP and NSP—voted for NC Vice-president Ram Chandra Paudel.
The Yadav group is close with Maoists.
The 7th round parliamentary election to elect the successor of Caretaker Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal is being tomorrow [Tuesday].
Maoist Chairman Prachanda and Paudel are contesting the election.
nnnn



NC’s first woman president

Kathmandu, 6 Sept.: Sita Debi Yadav is the first district president of NC.
She was elected president of Siraha.
Nnnn

Bodyguard injured in blast

Kathmandu, 6 Sept.: Bodyguard Shiva Shanker Chaudhary of Rautahat local development officer (LDO) Bishnuraj Lamichane was injured in Sunday’s bomb blast hidden under the officer’s chair in office.
Lamichane was not on the chair.
Terai Cobra Nagra claimed responsibility.
nnnn
•
• German found dead
•
• Kathmandu, 6 Sept.: German national Janosch Laupesien, 40, was found dead in his room at a lodge in Jhoche Sunday.
• The cause of the death wasn;t known.
• nnnn EDITORIL
-
UNHCR remains as long as there are refugees



UNHCR is overseeing the largest resettlement programme of any country in recent years. Some 35,000 Bhutanese refugees have already been resettled after living nearly two decades in the camps in Eastern Nepal. At this rate in next few years the camps are likely to be empty save a few thousand refugees who haven’t declared interest or have been rejected by the resettling countries. UNHCR is also responsible for facilitating the safe transit of Tibetans into India. The Post broke the news last month of the existence of a Gentleman’s Agreement to provide safe passage to new Tibetan arrivals between the UNHCR, Western countries and Nepal. John Narayan Parajuli spoke with Stéphane Jaquemet, the country representative of UNHCR in Kathmandu about the ongoing resettlement process, Tibetan refugees and the agency’s future in Nepal.



How would you describe the ongoing resettlement process of the Bhutanese refugees?



I think it is going extremely well. Nepal has become the largest resettlement operation in the world. First we have this tremendous interest from resettlement countries. Secondly we have more than 99 percent acceptance rate, which is exceptional. Depending on nationalities, usually the acceptance rate is less than 90 percent. The refugees from Bhutan adjust well. Of course there are exceptions. But most of them are perceived extremely well by the resettlement countries. They are considered as law-abiding, modest and extremely respectful of the environment wherever they go.

UNHCR always believes in voluntary repatriation as the best solution. Since that wasn’t possible, resettlement was the only option. Out of the remaining some 77,000 in camps, over 56,500 have declared interest. About 20,000 haven’t declared interests, but that number is decreasing as we speak. We believe that at certain point, the number of people not committed for resettlement will be less than 10,000.



What happens to those who do not sign up for resettlement or those who have been rejected by the host countries?



When I say that the acceptance rate is 99 percent, it doesn’t mean that the other one percent has been rejected. Some cases are on hold. In that sense, the real rejection rate is minimal. For the others, I think more will declare interest as time progresses. There were rumours in the camp that resettlement will close in 2011/2012. There is no such deadline. Resettlement will continue to be available as long as there is an interest. Not that we want people to go at any cost. It’s not a UNHCR decision. On the contrary, it’s the people’s decision. But my feeling is that there will be very few people who will not declare an interest.



There are certain countries that will only take a set number of refugees. Does that mean refugees will have fewer options?



You have to realise that more than 85 percent of the refugees will go to the United States. So the US will remain the major option. The US has been very clear in leaving the door open. At one point the US had said that it will only take up to 60,000. Now it has said that it will continue to take refugees well beyond that threshold. But I am also optimistic that most of the countries will continue to have interest in the refugees from Bhutan



With regards to people who may be left behind, have you had any discussions with Nepal government on locally integrating them?



It’s a decision that the Nepal government will have to make. But for the time the number remains high and people are still expressing an interest in resettlement. But we have to be aware that at one point, the question will be asked and it will very much depend on the profile of the people. And one thing we should not forget is voluntary repatriation. So far we haven’t been successful, but I also believe when the numbers go down, Bhutan may be more open to voluntary repatriation.




Does this optimism come from your contact with the Bhutanese authorities?



To be frank, there isn’t much going on on

that front. Our optimism stems from the belief that Bhutan has a responsibility and the international community should remind Bhutan of its obligation.




What happens to the camps and infrastructure itself?



From the UNHCR perspective, we will not be able to continue spreading out. We will have to merge the camps and consolidate the

services in a few places. But this is something we have to work on with the government. It’s not a decision UNHCR can take alone. When we merge the camps, we should take into account that for 20 years the local people have been generous and we should also express our gratitude in certain ways.



The presence of UNHCR and the refugees does contribute significantly to the local economy. UNHCR’s pull-out from camps may show some withdrawal symptoms. Have you thought about, perhaps, mitigating some of these effects?



We would like very much to do so. However, UNHCR doesn’t have the expertise. We will like to involve other actors. As the refugees have been in the Jhapa and Morang districts for 20 years, we believe we have a responsibility vis-à-vis the host community—not just to thank them for their generosity but to some extent to compensate them for their loss.



In the last few years Nepal had taken a tough line with regards Tibetans

fleeing into Nepal and the Western countries have been quite critical of Nepal’s approach. What are your agency’s concerns?



Since early 1990s we have what we call a Gentlemen’s Agreement with the authorities, which is based on international law. As per the agreement, UNHCR will be facilitating the safe transit of Tibetan new arrivals to India. There is a commitment from both the UNHCR and Nepali government to continue the existing system which is based on Nepal’s international obligations.



Can you elaborate on the agreement?



Like any other country in the world, Nepal has an obligation not to return people seeking international protection. Based on that and out of humanitarian consideration, it was felt that UNHCR would play a role in facilitating the safe transit to India of the Tibetan new arrivals. Although Nepal is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention, it is party to a number of human rights instruments and treaties which contain the obligation of non-return of people seeking international protection. There was an op-ed in your newspaper which stated that international practice says that migrants can be deported. But this is not correct for someone who seeks international protection. The latter cannot be deported.



What is the precise number of Tibetan refugees in Nepal?



The estimated figure is approximately 20,000. The pre-1990s Tibetan refugees are recognised as refugees on a prima facie basis by the Nepali government. In particular, these refugees are entitled to Refugee Cards attesting to their right to reside in the country. In practice, however, the issuance/renewal of such documents has been inconsistent. Accordingly, UNHCR has advocated with the government for the issuance of documentation to all persons of concern in the long staying population of Tibetans in Nepal. UNHCR does not provide any form of assistance to the pre-1990 Tibetan refugees.



Are there plans to resettle the pre-1990 Tibetan refugees as well?



I don’t think it is on the agenda and UNHCR has not resettled any Tibetan refugees.



Now let’s talk about UNHCR’s future. Will the conclusion of Bhutanese resettlement process automatically lead to a drawdown of your office here?



UNHCR will remain in Nepal as long as there are refugees in the country. We will continue to provide international protection and assistance and seek durable solutions for all refugees in Nepal. However, the presence of UNHCR will very much depend on the Government of Nepal.

In addition to its statutory function of providing protection for refugees, UNHCR has a specific and global mandate to prevent and reduce statelessness. UNHCR continues its advocacy efforts in coordination with other UN agencies, academics, legislators, and civil society to raise awareness and advocate for finding solutions to the problem of statelessness in Nepal. In addition, UNHCR continues to promote the adoption of appropriate citizenship laws and policies and ensure that the new Constitution meets international standards and Nepal’s obligations under international human rights treaties regarding equal, non-discriminatory and effective access to citizenship.
nnnn

Govt to urge United Nations to reduce UNMIN role in Nepal


Kathmandu, 6 Sept.: The government is likely to send a letter to the United Nations tomorrow [Monday] requesting the Security Council to extend UN Mission in Nepal’s term by three or four months with reduced mandate, according to sources at the Prime Minister’s Office, The Himalayan Times reports.

“In the updated mandate, UNMIN will be relieved from its responsibility of monitoring the management of arms and armed personnel of Nepali Army,” Prime Minister’s Foreign Affairs Adviser Rajan Bhattarai told THT.

Madhav Kumar Nepal-led government and its coalition partners are reluctant to keep the national army under UN supervision for long, saying continued monitoring of national army will affect its training and recruitment process and hamper the organisational capabilities as a whole.

UCPN-Maoist has been opposing curtailment of the UNMIN’s mandate. It has warned that peace process would become a failure if UNMIN was not allowed to monitor the Nepali Army.

“Government will clarify its position about UNMIN’s fate in the letter likely to be sent on Monday,” added Bhattarai, who has been involved in the discussions regarding UNMIN’s future.

UNMIN’s mandate of assisting in the monitoring of ceasefire arrangements, providing technical assistance to the Election Commission in the planning and preparation and conduct of the election of a Constituent Assembly has already been completed and its relevance will be reviewed, added Bhattarai.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is scheduled to submit his report about Nepal’s peace process and the UNMIN’s term to the UNSC on September 7. Before that Nepal must convey its decision to the UN.

In his preliminary report distributed to the concerned stakeholders, Ki-moon is learnt to have proposed termination of UNMIN from Nepal if political parties here failed to reach a consensus on UNMIN’s role in the peace process.

In his report, Ki-moon mentioned that only a new government could review UNMIN’s mandate, UNMIN source added.

The PM has been consulting the leaders of different parties and envoys to share his view on UNMIN’s fate. Today he discussed the same with Indian Ambassador to Nepal Rakesh Sood. “PM opined that Nepali Army should be kept outside UNMIN’s monitoring,” his adviser quoted PM as telling the ambassador.

Nepal has already taken up the issue with the envoys of the Unites States, United Kingdom, Russia, China and Japan. Established in January 2007 by the Security Council, UNMIN´s sixth term expires on September 15.
Nnnn

Convicted Maoist free

Kathmandu, 6 Sept.: A UCPN (Maoist) leader, who has been moving freely despite being convicted of murder by the supreme court in January, could be jailed for life and have his constituency assembly membership terminated, The Himalayan Times reports.
Balkrishna Dhungel was convicted by the apex court on January 3, but has been moving freely due to the lax execution on the part of the state.
The conviction on murder charge is a strong ground of terminating the CA membership as per thee interim constitution of Nepal.
The apex court had prepared the full text of judgment last week but it was made public only today [Sunday].
A division bench of Justices Top Bahadur Magar and Rakendra Prasad Koirala had convicted him in 1998 murder of Uddhav Shrestha. The apex court had slapped 20-year jail sentence and the confiscation of his property on January 3 while responding to an appeal of the government.
Nnnn

President trims China entourage

Kathmandu, 6 Sept.: Following media criticism and instruction from President Dr Ram Baran Yadav, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) has cut down president’s China visit entourage, a source at the ministry said Sunday, Republica reports.
‘Initially, the ministry had finalized a 21-member entourage for the president’s maiden trip to China. Now, there will only by 14 officials,” said the source on condition of anonymity.
The official visit begins October 27.
The president is attending the concluding ceremony of the Shanghai Expo.
Nnnn

TRADE, COMMERCE, ECONOMY

Trade delegation in China

Kathmandu, 6 Sept.: A five-member trade delegation led by Nepal-China Chamber of Commerce Industry (NCCCC) Chairman Rajesh Kazi Shrestha left for China Friday.
The delegation will discuss agreements and trade expansion in Shanghai and participate in the 14th China International Fair for Investment and Trade. In Xiamen and the7th China International SME Fair in Guangzhou.
Nnnn

SPORTS

Team for U-19 championship selected

Kathmandu, 6 Sept.: Cricket Association of Nepal (CAN) Sunday announced a 14-member squad for the ACC Under-19 Women’s Championship in Singapore from 4 to 14 October.
Nary Thapa was re-appointed captain.
Other team members are: Rubina Chand,9vice-captain), Mamata Thapa, Sarita Magar, Sita Rana Magar, Soni Khadka, Shradda Aryal, Arati Bidari, Manisha Rawal, Indu Barma, Trishna Singh, Anjali Chand, Nima Tamang ,Gita Chand.
Jyoti Pandey, Kritu Dahal, Kabita Gautam and Samana Pun Magar are reserves.
Nepal, Hong Kong, Kuwait, Qatar and Singapore are in group A.
nnnn